Many analogies come to mind when describing this
Lamar course, a journey, coming of age, a
battle, but none quite fit, thank goodness because they are all very bad
examples. The experience has been
beneficial however. Beginning this
course, I knew I needed a plan at some point in the somewhat distant future and
had a vague idea or two of what I thought I wanted to do and then found I
suddenly need a full blown, action packed, clear-cut, angels singing inspired
PLAN. It was too soon for me, and I felt
myself drowning in doubt, mired in quicksand of apprehension and feeling the
timidity of my feeble little, vague ideas.
I began week one assignment with trepidation. I found that as I progressed my little ideas
coalesced into bigger ideas, and I was able to formulate an action research
plan using the templates, recommendations and ideas from the readings. As a whole, the course guided step-by-step
through the process and allowed me to pull my plan together into a cohesive
project without panicking too much. I
would say the web conferences were extremely valuable sources of information
and very appreciated for the time given and patience in answering all the
repeated questions. All in all, I would say the facebook group has been a real lifesaver! I have been steadily tweaking the plan, paring it down, scaling it down. I feel much less like hyperventilating. The Mayans may have predicted the end of the world, but with the end of this course I see more of a life. Beginning this action research plan - the new and improved plan will be much easier. I still need to change it on paper, but it is more manageable. I have also learned through the self-reflection and feed back from the blogs, discussion groups, facebook how much that validation has become. I have become a student again after, well, 1/4 of a century? While I always felt I was supportive of my students, I think I am more emphatic to their need for validation. I also do not underestimate the power of social media. I have tried to start social media support for the classroom before, but will renew my efforts again!
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Saturday, December 8, 2012
This week's journey
I have done a great deal of reading and research on my topic of interest and action research plan. Writing the topic questions, plan and particulars was not as easy as I expected. The conference web was extremely helpful however. I decided on the topic of technology use. President Clinton established an executive order in 1997 calling for a technology in education (President William Clinton, Executive order 12999) Since then schools have been buying every new technology item on the market and putting it into the classroom. Teachers use them or not according to their inclination. One article in the New York Times quoted a superintendent, David Schauer, " My gut is telling me we've had growth, but we have to have some measure that is valid, and we don't have that yet." I know we have technology on our campus that is not being utilized, we have potential, we can increase our learning and have an impact. I would like to be a part of that process. I think I have put together a plan to explore possibilities, and allow research and measure progress. I may be trying to turn the Titanic, but we shall see. I have already gained knowledge in putting together the plan in the different areas, and tweaked activities, changed surveys, and drafted colleagues for their expertise.
Action plan template
Action Planning Template
|
|||||
Goal:
1.
What resources are available on campus to teachers and students?
2.
What resources are not being used and why? What can be done to resolve
this?
3.
How can we as a campus increase usage of technology to create higher level lessons in the
classroom to engage interactive student learning?
4.
Does technology lead to higher level lessons and learning? How is it
being used? Can we change how it is being used?
5.
Using measurable data such as teacher walkthroughs, test scores,
surveys, STAAR results, can a campus use technology to increase/change higher
level learning lessons/teaching?
|
|||||
Action
Steps(s):
|
Person(s)
Responsible:
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
Assessment of technology resources and needs
|
Sharon Matthews
|
Start 12/12
End 1/13
|
Inventory list, survey,
|
Summative meeting has determined a need,
surveys will identify needs of resources
|
|
Redesign of school website.
|
Sharon Matthews
|
Start 12/12
End 5/13
|
Training, meeting with district tech support
|
Website is out of date, teachers are not
using websites
|
|
Increased use of teacher websites by
creating training sessions. Creating a
simple, easy to follow format and update information online class page for
students and parents.
|
Sharon Matthews |
Starts 12/12
Ends 5/13
|
Training sessions
|
Check for teacher pages if training
lincreased use and increased site traffic
|
|
Identify use of technology or lack of with
accompanying research supporting higher level lessons in the classroom and
STAAR
|
Sharon Matthews | Starts 12/12 | meetings with departments |
Walkthroughs,
Surveys,
check 6 week
test scores
and compare
|
|
Create training sessions of technology
smartboards, etc
|
Sharon Matthews
|
Start 1/13
Ends 5/13
|
Meetings, equipment, research
|
Track attendance, use after sessions,
lessons
|
|
Create training sessions for available
technology programs, edmodo, eduphoria, internet access programs
|
Sharon Matthews, tech
support
|
Starts 1/13
Ends 5/13
|
Meetings
Equipment
Research
manuals
|
Use surveys to evaluate, walkthroughs, test
scores,
|
|
Conduct walkthroughs to see lessons in
action
|
Sharon Matthews
|
Starts 2/13
Ends 5/13
|
Time
Volunteer teachers
Walkthrough format
|
track lessons
|
|
Evaluate walkthrough information on teacher
lessons
|
Principals
Sharon Matthews
|
Starts 12/12
Ends 5/13
|
Walkthrough data before and after efforts
|
Compare data
|
|
Meeting with departments on higher level
lessons and connection to STAAR test scores as part of curriculum –support
efforts to use technology in lessons
|
Sharon Matthews
|
Start 2/13
End 4/13
|
Tea resources
research
|
Attendance
|
|
Create a blog to track experiences on
sharonmatthews1212.blogspot.com for self reflection
|
Sharon Matthews
|
11/12
|
Blog account
time
|
Track followers and feedback
|
|
Have regular meetings with mentor, tech
support MStill for help to follow plan, analyze data and guide the process
|
Sharon Matthews, Dr. Abel,
MStill-tech support
|
starts12/12
ends-5/13
|
Time and helpful colleagues
|
Adjust plan as necessary
|
|
Create a wish list of technology wanted and a
budget for next year-perhaps a grant writing
|
Dept heads
Dr. Abel
|
5/13
|
|
|
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Decisions! Decisions! Decisions!
In the 60's, 1960's not the 1860's as my students would have one believe, life was simple. The shampoo aisle had three shampoos. Easy choice. Breck. Cereal was no problem because there were no more than five choices if that many. Now each of these have entire aisles taking up both sides and decisions are not easy. I had the task of choosing a topic of research and research was necessary before deciding. I foolishly believed it would be no problem. The last time I said something to that effect, I found myself on a black diamond instead of the bunny slope while skiing. I had the same feeling this week.
I had so many ideas before I started the videos and readings. While completing the week's assignments, I felt like I was playing a game of Chutes and Ladders. Watching the videos validated my sense of purpose and what I believed in education. Dr. Chargois' emphasis on data synchronized with my idea of evaluation and lessons. Since he is the Superintendent of my district, and we stress using data to affect change in lesson delivery, it was only natural my thoughts would go in that direction with the pressure of accountability on my mind in every report I write and write and write.
I brainstormed, more readings. I checked my group's discussion board and posted my ideas. Thank you for the comments. Feedback is very helpful in both validation and fixing any problems. My third idea came to me as most ideas, in a flash. I was rummaging in my cabinet and found an old technology gadget for
which I never received the cords, the software installed (our district has a
block on our computers for self installed software), or training or manual. This was brand new when I got it. I am
not the helpless type, but this was two too many obstacles. I have very limited time, even though I get
to school at 7:30 am for an 8:20am bell and usually leave at 6:00pm.
I don’t have time to fumble around in the dark. I also read an email
about a great website for our district and please use it asap. I
opened it. I have no username and no
password. I don’t know who to ask to
track this down or the time. I decided that with many new teachers, new administrative
staff and a push to purchase new technology the last few years, something
needed to be done. We have one tech
person on our campus who is inundated with trouble shooting. I have helped on many occasions for our wing
and training purposes, so it would be a natural. I thought I would inventory the available
technology to what was being used, do some training, troubleshoot and get
whatever needed connected done. Track
what technology was being used in the classroom to what effect. Our district is writing technology grants,
and I would like to see where our school fits into that grant. This is a multi-layered
study, but I have a definite beginning, middle and end plan. It has purpose, focus and identifies a
definite need for our campus. Teachers
and students benefit from increased technology because we are a Title I campus
and many students do not have access to technology at home. I don’t like waste and feel too much is wasted
just sitting in a cabinet. I can match
the technology with the teacher, and create easily accessible training to
fit their needs and schedule. When I
presented this topic to my principal, I had no problem articulating my plan or
focus. If this plan meets with Lamar’s
standards, this will be my plan. The
problem will be the use of technology on campus, research will be on new
programs, free internet programs like the ones we used tagxedo and animoto, or programs we already have purchased, classroom use of technology, effects, the need,
teacher training, and measurability will be based on amount of increased use of
technology, use of technology in lesson plans, surveys for effects or benefits, and
a look at future needs. A comprehensive policy, or manual of available technology on campus, installed on computers and available internet resources along with future purchasing recommendations could be a final product. I can already see problems, this is something our campus needs, and I would like to study how other campuses incorporate technology when there isn't enough to go around.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)